fkn0wned archive

Google Hacking Master List (reply-to-unlock)

A classic 'reply to unlock' bait post that kept members grinding out low-effort thank-yous for eight months straight

VIP member Fopje posted a hidden 'Google Hacking Master List' (likely a collection of Google dorks for finding exposed files, logins, or vulnerable sites) behind Fkn0wned's classic reply-to-unlock wall. The thread ran from September 2010 to at least mid-2011, filling up almost entirely with one-word 'ty', 'thanks', and reaction-emoji replies from members farming access and reputation. One user, silentrock, chimed in to correct the terminology, noting the technique is properly called 'google dorks' rather than a generic hacking list. It's a perfect time capsule of early-2010s forum culture: content locked behind engagement, and a community happy to bump a thread hundreds of times just to see it.

Umm,i think its names are "google dorks"— [VIP] silentrock

Got to hate hide, what is this even?— Emxo

Thanks for your sharing generosity— iFlux

How to Join Anonymous - A Beginner's Guide

Back in 2011, half the forum wanted in on Anonymous, and this thread was the front door

Admin [FkN] rhets posted a hidden-content guide on how to 'join' the Anonymous collective, sparking a long, mostly low-effort reply-to-unlock thread. Beyond the usual 'thx' and 'show me' posts, a few members debated what Anonymous actually was — a real hacktivist ideology versus a meme-able bogeyman blamed for everything from trolling to terrorism. The thread ran to 50+ replies over about a month, capturing the era's fascination with (and confusion about) Anonymous.

Good info, many people think that anon is a group that only specific people can join— [VIP] FR3QU3NCY

THis is good shit, most people think that Anonymous is an organized cyber terrorist shit. Anonymous is more like a multiple-faces ideology.— [1K] silentrock

Anon is everybody, but who cares. there a bunch of players who make alittle group and call themselves Anon, and take the whole 'Anon' name into bad, dark shit.— SchnookieKin

14 Crypters Dump (Reposted from HackForums)

A crypter dump thread that ran for months on 'thanks bro' alone

In the Computer Security and Hacking > Discussion section, member [FkN] Fopje posted a share of 14 crypters (tools used to obfuscate files), admitting he hadn't tested them or checked if any were FUD (undetected by antivirus). The thread became a long-running low-effort bump train, with dozens of members dropping one-line 'thanks'/'ty' replies over several months just to unlock the hidden download link. One member, [FkN] Zyzz, called out the post as simply reposted content lifted from HackForums.

I did not test these and don't know if any of them is FUD— [FkN] Fopje

you just copy everything off hackforums -.-— [FkN] Zyzz

so what if he does, still easier then forum hopping ty— Krazygood

Request: Software Like Brutus

One member wanted a Brutus-style bruteforcer — the resident crew talked him out of it on the spot.

A short, quiet request thread in the Computer Security and Hacking > Discussion section where member NiEDEZ asked for a password-cracking tool similar to the old Brutus bruteforcer. A [FkN] Crew member, Lipscomb, replied with a dose of practical skepticism, noting bruteforcers are generally slow and ineffective and suggesting keylogging or session hijacking as better routes. The thread ends there — just two posts, no further discussion, a small snapshot of the kind of casual tool-requests that filled this section of the board.

For the most part, Bruteforcers dont work very well, and if they do work, take a very long time to do so.— [FkN] Lipscomb

Someone can Send me a software likes Brutus— NiEDEZ